Without the acrimony and fanfare that doomed a instructor evaluation bill last month, the Legislature with near unanimity passed and Gov. Brown has now signed a milestone main and teacher evaluation bill.

Sen. Carol Liu, author of SB 1292 (click to enlarge).

Sen. Carol Liu, writer of SB 1292 (click to enlarge).

Key differences between SB 1292 for administrators and the ill-fated AB 5 for teachers helped smooth the style for passage. Chief among them: SB 1292 is voluntary, not mandatory: Districts aren't jump to use the provisions, which advocates of the bill admit is a weakness; and districts retain the power to define the primal elements of an evaluation. Under AB 5, everything would have been subject to collective bargaining, a source of contention between teachers unions and groups representing school boards and superintendents.

Only there are also primal similarities between the two bills – and, coincidentally, between SB 1292 and recommendations for ambassador evaluations in Greatness by Design, the report this month of country Superintendent Tom Torlakson'due south Educator Excellence Task Force – creating the hope, if not a management, for a breakthrough in the deadlock that adult over a teacher evaluation neb. ACSA, the Clan of California School Administrators, had a potent hand in writing the legislation.

SB 1292, authored past Sen. Carol Liu, a Pasadena Democrat, makes articulate, as does the task force written report, that an evaluation'southward main objective is "to guide primary growth and to meliorate principal functioning while raising pupil achievement" – every bit opposed to simply weeding out poorly performing principals without an opportunity for them to become more effective.

Source: Greateness by Design

Source: Greateness by Design (click to overstate).

The bill also suggests using a number of measures that contain the California Professional person Standards for Educational Leaders (run into chart at left). These are the bases on which principals and administrators are trained, so information technology makes sense to base reviews on them. They include promoting constructive didactics and learning, involving parents and the community in the school, managing effectively, communicating a vision of the schoolhouse that others share, and setting an example of ethical and professional leadership.

SB 1292 also suggests including growth in student learning equally office of an evaluation using items from a carte du jour of many measures: state standardized tests, commune assessments, Advanced Placement and college entrance tests, and performance assessments such equally portfolios (Greatness by Design too suggested using omnipresence, graduation and dropout rates, the progress of English learners, and school climate indicators as additional measures.)

Using schoolwide examination scores

The California Teachers Association and the California Federation of Teachers have criticized as unreliable the utilize of land standardized test scores for instructor evaluations. This includes value-added models (VAM) that take into account students' background and past achievements in  measuring a teacher's impact on students' learning.

Using schoolwide examination results in an administrators' evaluation is a less contentious outcome. The scores tend to be less volatile than for individual teachers, and schools' CST data are public and widely published. Giving scores also much weight, even so, tin can also create perverse incentives: pressuring low-scoring, troubled students to drop out or transfer to some other school.

The bill recommends that districts evaluate administrators annually for the first ii years on the job, and then leaves it upwards to districts to decide how often to practise evaluations.

The state's electric current law, the Stull Act, requires evaluations of all certificated employees, so it technically covers administrators. However, the law sets out requirements for evaluating only teachers, creating a need for a law that's oriented to administrators.

Laura Preston, a lobbyist for ACSA, said that administrators take supported a comprehensive evaluation system. Greatness by Design was specially disquisitional of the lack of resources, mentoring, and effective training of principals and administrators; more resources for professional development are essential to an effective evaluation system. Administrators also viewed objective, evidence-based evaluations equally job protection from capricious demotions, since in all merely a handful of big districts with administrator unions they are at-volition employees who can exist sent back to teach in the classroom without having to institute cause.

Preston said that ACSA favored mandatory evaluations under SB 1292, which would accept required the state to reimburse districts for evaluation expenses. But ACSA recognized that Dark-brown likely would have vetoed a nib that was too prescriptive and that added to the state budget.

The primary benefit, she said, is that the new police "can serve as a valuable way to better leadership." Both she and Sen. Alan Lowenthal, who chaired Senate Didactics Committee,  predicted that the law eventually would be amended to become a district mandate.

To get more reports similar this ane, click here to sign up for EdSource's no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.